Monday 16 October 2000
Mohawks okay deal with feds
LYNN MOORE
The Gazette
By a mere two votes,
Kanesatake residents have ratified a controversial agreement with the federal
government that will give the band council the power to enact bylaws governing
its territory near Oka.
The final tally of
Saturday's vote was 239 in favour of the land-governance agreement, 237 opposed
and 10 spoiled ballots, Kanesatake grand chief James Gabriel said yesterday.
"Obviously, it is a
very tight vote, but we said from the beginning that it takes a simple majority
to pass, and that is what the results are," Gabriel said.
The negotiation process
that led to the agreement began in the wake of the 1990 Oka crisis. In June,
federal Indian Affairs Minister Robert Nault described the agreement as
historic, calling it "self-government in the making."
Federal officials were
notified of the closeness of the vote and agreed that a simple majority rules,
Gabriel said. "There has been a very active campaign against the
agreement. I think both sides worked very hard to get their people out,"
he said.
Opponents of the deal
faxed a letter to Nault yesterday, saying they will appeal the results of the
ratification vote, which concluded Saturday. Advance polls were held Oct. 7.
The process was flawed,
said Pearl Bonspille, a Kanesatake homemaker. Among other things, staff working
at the polling stations were band-council employees and there were no
independent scrutineers, she said.
The person in charge of
overseeing the vote, Robert Johnson, could not be reached for comment
yesterday.
John Harding, a municipal
police officer who is contesting his dismissal from the Kanesatake force, was
one of the most vocal critics of the agreement.
"The ratification
process was very, very rushed," Harding said yesterday. "The most
important issue is that we weren't given the right to express our
opinions" about the pact.
Gabriel said the next
step in the process is for the federal government to enact legislation that
will put the agreement into effect.
The pact will provide for
a clear definition of Kanesatake lands and, for the first time, give the band
council the power to enforce its bylaws on its territory.
"We will have a lot
more control of our lands than what would be provided under the Indian
Act," Gabriel said.
"In the case of
reserves under the Indian Act, when (bylaws) are passed, they have to have the
permission of the minister of Indian Affairs to be able to enact them.
"In our case, we
won't need the permission of the minister."
The negotiation process
that led to the tentative agreement began shortly after the armed conflict that
became known as the Oka crisis.
One Surete du Quebec
officer was killed when provincial police stormed a roadblock Mohawks had
erected in an area called the Pines to block the expansion of a municipal golf
course onto an ancestral Mohawk burial ground.
After the resulting
78-day standoff with provincial police and federal troops, the federal
government bought about 160 properties near the disputed land, including part
of the Pines.
The agreement officially
transfers those lands to the band council. And it sets up the framework to
harmonize Kanesatake and Oka municipal bylaws.
It also settles the
question of jurisdiction, paving the way for economic development of the
territory, Gabriel said.
"For many years, the
status of our territory was ambiguous," he said.
For instance, if it is
not clear whether provincial construction laws apply to the territory, it is
very difficult to get entrepreneurs to build businesses, Gabriel said.
"This
land-governance agreement removes that ambiguity," he said.
Harding said many
community members are concerned about the sweeping powers the agreement gives
the band council, and they still don't know how the agreement will affect their
individual rights.
"Many people weren't
sure which way to vote, and many didn't vote at all," Harding said.
There are between 1,100
and 1,200 eligible voters in Kanesatake, Gabriel said.
Focus and consultation
groups were created prior to drafting the agreement's text, Gabriel said. Using
input from that process, the text of the agreement was hammered out over two
years, he said.
In July, there were two
public meetings, but the second disintegrated when some attendees made efforts
to call for Gabriel and another chief to resign, Gabriel said.
"We opted to
continue with workshops (information sessions) rather than public-forum
discussions because the agenda of discussing the land-governance issue was not
kept," Gabriel said.